Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Innovative Technologies in Offshore Drilling

With much of the ‘easy’ oil and gas in the world found and recovered, energy firms increasingly have to push to extreme frontiers to make new discoveries. This often means moving further offshore, drilling in waters up to 3000 meters (10,000 feet) deep, which until recently had been beyond the capabilities of even the most

accomplished exploration companies. Technological advances and an expanding pool of knowledge, however, have meant that previously inaccessible reserves can now be tapped, which is opening up a realm of new opportunities for those companies on the leading edge of innovation in the industry.

Below are three technologies that have the potential to push the boundaries of offshore drilling in the near future.Floating Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities

Floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facilities package all the components required to extract and process natural gas – drilling rig, treatment system, cooling plant for liquefaction, storage facilities – into a single floating vessel that can be towed out and left semi-permanently at an offshore deepwater gas field. The advantage of these titanic FLNG facilities is their ability to work geographically complex fields that that would otherwise be inaccessible by traditional floating or jack-up rigs.

Natural gas is often cooled to a liquid in order to facilitate its transportation, but this must be done at an onshore facility, which in turn requires a pipeline connection to the gas field. A permanent rig and pipeline system to the onshore facility is simply not feasible for some fields though, due to the distance from shore and ocean floor features such as trenches that can’t be crossed or that are too expensive to avoid. An FLNG facility skirts this pipeline problem by extracting and processing the gas onsite.

Shell (NYSE:RDS.A) is pioneering the development of FLNG facilities, working closely with Technip (EPA:TEC), a French company that specializes in gas technology, and Korean ship-builder Samsung Heavy Industries (SEO:010140). Shell’s first FLNG vessel is scheduled for completion in 2017, after which it will head to their Prelude gas field off the North West coast of Australia where it is expected to produce upwards of 3.6 million tonnes of LNG and per year.

Underwater Power Grids

For those oil and gas fields that can be connected by pipelines to onshore facilities, a particular challenge posed by deepwater operations is establishing a power system that can run the vast network of pipes, pumps, and compressors needed to get the oil and gas from the well to the processing plant. Onshore, such a system is fairly straight-forward to construct, but building a similar system underwater has always proven to be significantly more challenging.

German engineering conglomerate Siemens (ETR:SIE) has designed a power grid that will enable deepwater pipeline networks to operate properly, and which increase the effectiveness of processing components. The grid can power processing systems in water up to 3000 meters (10,000 feet) deep, and Siemens have already developed power grids for use in deepwater offshore fields by Petrobras at their Carapeba field in Brazil and Statoil at their Snorre project in Norway.

Siemens have also recently acquired two sub-sea specialist companies, Poseidon Group AS and Bennex Group AS, to strengthen their position in underwater power generation market.

Deepwater Containment Systems

Though well containment systems prevent oil and gas from flowing, rather than facilitate it, they are, nonetheless, a key development for the offshore drilling industry. The Deepwater Horizon spill of 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico highlighted some of the risks involved in offshore drilling, and threatened the long-term future of the industry. Under pressure from regulators and shareholders, however, many large exploration companies have responded. The result is the development of containment systems that can be used to cap blown out wells in depths of up to 3000 meters (10,000 feet).

Trendsetter Engineering Inc. has designed a capping stack with a pressure capacity of 15,000 pounds per square inch as part of a containment system that is able to capture up to 100,000 barrels of oil or 200 million cubic feet of gas per day. These systems have so far been acquired by at least two groups, the Marine Well Containment Company, and the Helix Well Containment Group, whose members include most of the oil majors and large independents operating in the Gulf of Mexico. Members of these two groups have access to the containment systems should their own equipment fail.

Securing deepwater drilling permits in the Gulf of Mexico now requires access to a containment system, which not only satisfies regulators and shareholders, but could also provide some measure of financial security for companies in the event of a blowout.source: resourceinvestingnews.com

Escape UK: Find Jobs Abroad and Get Work Overseas

Ironically, when we created Shelter Offshore much of our focus was on living abroad and how to achieve the dream life overseas, but we failed to focus on working abroad sufficiently until our readers drew our attention to this lack on our part.

We focused on where to live, how to live, how to invest to make your money go far further, and even where to buy stunning property overseas – but the key to all of this is of course having the financial means to enable you to relocate. Of course we redressed the balance and introduced the working abroad section to our living abroad channel and the rest is history…

…or not quite! You see, we recently read that 1 in 4 Britons would move abroad for work reasons. However, many are restricted by lack of knowledge about how to find jobs abroad and get work overseas so that they can escape UK. Which means that this guide to securing an income abroad is required reading. Why Do So Many Britons Want to Escape UK and Work Abroad?

The latest British government statistics, as quoted on Expat Forum.com, reveal that work reasons account for about 57% of relocations away from the UK.

Britons want to move because the economy in the UK is so bad, job security is a thing of the past, and because there is no hope on the horizon that things will improve.

Whilst other nations have also faced their own share of economic issues, Britain is doing particularly poorly with high inflation, a weak pound and a stagnant yet still overpriced property market. Therefore to escape al of this, Britons want to move abroad and find a better working environment, improved job prospects and a better lifestyle.
Where Can You Earn the Most Money From Working Overseas?

Last year we produced a report on the 10 best countries to work in abroad if you want more money.

The countries that rank highest include a really diverse mix of nations around the world. If you don’t want to venture too far then Switzerland comes in at number 7, if you want to earn the most then consider Singapore or Russia, or if you want to take more of your salary home without the erosion of personal taxation, look to the UAE and perhaps work in Dubai for example.
Should You Focus on Income or Lifestyle?

In talking about the amount of money you can potentially earn if you go overseas for work however, we’re perhaps missing a fundamental fact. Many who choose to move abroad and look for jobs overseas do so to buy into an improved lifestyle.

So, is it all about the money? For some people working abroad is about a short-term contract and banking as much as possible. But for others who simply want a better quality of life, the work is secondary. As long as they earn enough to indeed enjoy an improved lifestyle, that’s sufficient.

You need to think about what’s important to you, as this will drive elements of your relocation such as your country choice and the work you’re willing to do for example.
Should You Seek Employment Abroad or Work for Yourself?

If you have a burning desire to branch out and start your own business, you could combine a relocation abroad with the realisation of your self-employment dream.

However, self-employment is tough – the bottom line is that you’re on your own in terms of making a business work. This reality can add stress to an already stressful time in your life. I.e., moving abroad is stressful, do you really want to add a new business venture on top?

Only you can answer this question for yourself.

If you decide that you do want to go it alone then perhaps the International Chamber of Commerce or the Chamber of Commerce local to your new nation will assist you as you set up and start trading.

If you want to work abroad for an employer then you need to decide whether it’s easier to get a job before you move, or relocate and then begin job hunting.
Think About Visas, Permissions and Qualifications

You need to determine whether you need a visa to work in your chosen nation. You also need to work out whether you need special permission to trade if you want to start a business – perhaps you even need a license?

The embassy of your new nation in the UK may be able to help. Or hop online to expat forums and get asking. Finally, factor in that your qualifications may not translate. You may need to re-qualify locally or have your skills, qualifications and experience documented and translated officially.
How Can You Find Work Overseas?

If you want to look for jobs before you move abroad, consider the following methods: -

- Use international recruitment agencies, all of which are online
- Use specialist recruitment agencies for your business sector, many have an international division for recruitment abroad
- Directly target potential employers. Do this by looking to see who’s recruiting, or by sending in a CV on spec
- Use forums and any contacts you have to begin networking before you relocate – find out if anyone’s hiring
- Sometimes there are international or country specific expos in major cities in the UK, recruiters often attend, so should you!

There are pros and cons associated with finding work before you go as opposed to relocating and then seeking employment. It can be easier to get a visa to live in some nations like Canada and Australia if you have an offer of employment before you apply. However, it can be easier to get a job if you’re on the ground and available to attend an interview.

Have a think about what suits you best…then go for it.
Factor in Business Viability and Job Security

The final aspect to consider when you’re thinking about finding jobs abroad or going overseas to work for yourself is the long-term viability of your plan.

If you’re starting a business you need to ensure the idea works locally to where you’re moving, or if it’s an online business for example, that you can make it pay. If you’re going to find a job overseas then you also need to know that there are plenty to go around!

If you rely on there just being 1 job or 1 opportunity for your business to succeed, you’re putting too much pressure and strain on yourself.

The more options you have the better. If you don’t like your first job you need to know you can apply for others. And if your business idea doesn’t take off immediately, it’s good to know that you can perhaps diversify or modify your idea and adapt it to the market. source: www.shelteroffshore.com

Job boost for Scottish offshore renewables industry

World-leading wind energy company Gamesa will create around 40 high-value jobs by this summer for its planned Offshore Wind Technology Centre, Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond has revealed as he announced £1.5m regional selective assistance to support the development of the renewables base on the outskirts of Glasgow.

Having selected Scotland, Gamesa announced earlier this year that Glasgow was its preferred location for the centre, subject to final agreements on financing.

Following a meeting between the First Minister and Gamesa Chairman and CEO Jorge Calvet, in Edinburgh this week, the company has confirmed that the Centre will be located at Strathclyde Business Park, about eight miles east of the city centre, and that it has started the recruitment process.

Gamesa expects to be employing around 40 engineering staff by July/August, with the potential to grow this to more than 100 by the end of this year - rising to 180 within three years of the Centre beginning operations. It is due to be officially opened in the autumn.Gamesa have indicated they are also prepared to invest in manufacturing, logistics and operations & maintenance (O&M) in Scotland, conditional upon development of offshore wind projects in the area, securing government support and the availability of sites for prototypes. If implemented successfully, Gamesa's offshore plan could represent an investment of around 50 million euro in Scotland and create 300 direct jobs in the country.

First Minister Salmond said: "I was delighted again to meet Sr Calvet and to hear about his plans for the company to develop its next generation wind turbines. Gamesa is one of the world's leading turbine manufacturers and the decision to establish its Offshore Wind Technology Centre at Strathclyde Business Park is a huge boost for the Greater Glasgow area and for Scotland's rapidly growing renewable energy sector.

"I'm very pleased that Gamesa has secured premises for the new Centre and the recruitment process is already underway, with around 50 people expected to be employed there within the next few months, and many more to follow. The Scottish Government, together with our partners in Scottish Development International and our enterprise agencies, are committed to maintaining optimum conditions for continued inward investment in our world-leading renewables industry."

Jorge Calvet added: "Our commitment is strong and we are preparing to play a role in the offshore wind market. Our Offshore Technology Centre in Glasgow represents an important step in this strategy. Our offshore plans could generate significant local, skilled and sustainable jobs over the coming years. I would like to recognise the support and commitment from the Scottish Government and its development agencies during the ongoing discussions around these investment plans."

Adrian Gillespie, Senior Director of Energy and Low Carbon Technologies, Scottish Enterprise, said: "Gamesa has made speedy progress in securing a suitable location for its Offshore Wind Technology Centre and it is extremely encouraging that recruitment is already underway for the initial intake of engineering staff. Such progress is a clear demonstration of the favourable business environment Scotland has to offer the renewables sector. We are pleased to back the company with a Regional Selective Assistance grant and will continue to work closely with Gamesa to support the development of their business in Scotland."

The company is working to launch two offshore platforms (the G11X-5.0 MW and G14X-6/7 MW) and it has also announced that the UK will be the centre of its offshore wind business. It plans to invest over 150 million euro there by 2014. Gamesa estimates that the construction and development of its offshore wind business in the United Kingdom will create over 1,000 direct jobs and another 800 indirect jobs at local suppliers.

Exclusivity agreements for developments amounting to up to 10GW of offshore wind generation capacity in Scottish waters over the next decade have been granted through the Crown Estate's Round Three and Scottish Territorial Waters leasing rounds.

Over its previous four-year term, the Scottish Government consented 42 renewable energy projects and in 2009, more than a quarter (27.4 per cent) of electricity demand came from renewables. There are around 7 GigaWatts (GW) of renewables capacity installed, under construction or consented around the country. In May the Scottish Government's raised its target for renewable electricity generation in 2020 from matching 80 per cent to 100 per cent of consumption levels.

Scotland has some of the greatest renewable resources in Europe, with as much as a quarter of the continent's offshore wind and tidal energy potential and an estimated 10 per cent of its wave power capacity. The Offshore Valuation Study published in May 2010 estimates Scotland's practical offshore renewables resource at 206 GW. Harnessing just a third of this generation potential could enable Scotland to meet its own domestic electricity needs seven times over by 2050 - positioning the country as a massive net exporter of renewable energy.

Regional Selective Assistance (RSA) is the main national scheme of financial assistance to industry. It provides discretionary grants to investment projects that will create and safeguard employment in areas designated for regional aid under European Community law. Payment of RSA is made in instalments, typically over several years as job and capital expenditure targets are met.
source: www.clickgreen.org.uk

Technology development and status of wind power

Onshore wind turbines are typically grouped together into wind power plants, sometimes also called wind farm projects. These wind power plants are often 5 to 300 MW in size.

Technology development and status of wind power
Modern, commercial grid-connected wind turbines have evolved from small, simple machines to large, highly sophisticated devices. Scientific and engineering expertise and advances, as well as improved computational tools, design standards, manufacturing methods, and O&M procedures, have all supported these technology developments.

As a result, typical wind turbine nameplate capacity ratings have increased dramatically since the 1980s (from roughly 75 kW to 1.5 MW and larger), while the cost of wind energy has substantially declined. Onshore wind energy technology is already being manufactured and deployed on a wind farm commercial basis. Nonetheless, additional R&D advances are anticipated, and are expected to further reduce the cost of wind energy while enhancing system and component performance and reliability.
Offshore wind farm technology is still developing, with greater opportunities for additional advancement. This section summarizes the historical development and current technology status of large grid connected on- and offshore wind turbines, discusses international wind energy technology standards, and reviews power conversion and related grid connection issues; a later section describes opportunities for further technical advances.

Basic design principles

Generating electricity from the wind requires that the kinetic energy of moving air be converted to mechanical and then electrical energy, thus the engineering challenge for the wind power industry is to design cost-effective wind turbines and wind farm plants to perform this conversion. The amount of kinetic energy in the wind that is theoretically available for extraction increases with the cube of wind speed.

However, a wind turbine only captures a portion of that available energy. Specifically, modern large wind turbines typically employ rotors that start extracting energy from the wind at speeds of roughly 3 to 4 m/s (cut-in speed). The Lanchester-Betz limit provides a theoretical upper limit (59.3%) on the amount of energy that can be extracted.

A wind turbine increases power production with wind speed until it reaches its rated power level, often corresponding to a wind speed of 11 to 15 m/s. At still-higher wind speeds, control systems limit power output to prevent overloading the wind turbine, either through stall control, pitching the blades, or a combination of both. Most wind turbines then stop producing energy at wind speeds of approximately 20 to 25 m/s (cut-out speed) to limit loads on the rotor and prevent damage to the turbine’s structural components.

Wind turbine design has centred on maximizing energy capture over the range of wind speeds experienced by wind turbines, while seeking to minimize the cost of wind energy. Increased generator capacity leads to greater energy capture when the turbine is operating at rated power (Region III). Larger rotor diameters for a given generator capacity, meanwhile, as well as aerodynamic design improvements, yield greater energy capture at lower wind speeds (Region II), reducing the wind speed at which rated power is achieved.

Variable speed operation allows energy extraction at peak efficiency over a wider range of wind speeds (Region II). Finally, because the average wind speed at a given location varies with the height above ground level, taller towers typically lead to increased energy capture.

To minimize cost, wind turbine design is also motivated by a desire to reduce materials usage while continuing to increase turbine size, increase component and system reliability, and improve wind power plant operations. A system-level design and analysis approach is necessary to optimize wind turbine technology, power plant installation and O&M procedures for individual wind turbines and entire wind farm plants.

Moreover, optimizing wind turbine and wind farm design for specific site conditions has become common as wind turbines, wind power plants and the wind energy market have all increased in size; site-specific conditions that can impact turbine and plant design include geographic and temporal variations in wind speed, site topography and access, interactions among individual wind turbines due to wake effects, and integration into the larger electricity system. Wind turbine and power plant design also impacts and is impacted by noise, visual, environmental and public acceptance issues.

Onshore wind energy technology

In the 1970s and 1980s, a variety of onshore wind turbine configurations were investigated, including both horizontal and vertical axis designs. Gradually, the horizontal axis design came to dominate, although configurations varied, in particular the number of blades and whether those blades were oriented upwind or downwind of the tower.

After a period of further consolidation, wind turbine designs largely centred (with some notable exceptions) around the three-blade, upwind rotor; locating the turbine blades upwind of the tower prevents the tower from blocking wind flow onto the blades and producing extra aerodynamic noise and loading, while three-bladed machines typically have lower noise emissions than two-bladed machines. The three blades are attached to a hub and main shaft, from which power is transferred (sometimes through a gearbox, depending on design) to a generator.

The main shaft and main bearings, gearbox, generator and control system are contained within a housing called the nacelle. In wind turbines without a gearbox, the rotor is mounted directly on the generator shaft.

In the 1980s, larger machines were rated at around 100 kW and primarily relied on aerodynamic blade stall to control power production from the fixed blades. These wind turbines generally operated at one or two rotational speeds. As turbine size increased over time, development went from stall control to full-span pitch control in which turbine output is controlled by pitching (i.e., rotating) the blades along their long axis.

In addition, a reduction in the cost of power electronics allowed variable speed wind turbine operation. Initially, variable speeds were used to smooth out the torque fluctuations in the drive train caused by wind turbulence and to allow more efficient operation in variable and gusty winds. More recently, almost all electric system operators require the continued operation of large wind farm plants during electrical faults, together with being able to provide reactive power: these requirements have accelerated the adoption of variable-speed operation with power electronic conversion.

Modern wind turbines typically operate at variable speeds using full-span blade pitch control. Blades are commonly constructed with composite materials, and towers are usually tubular steel structures that taper from the base to the nacelle at the top.

Over the past 30 years, average wind turbine size has grown significantly, with the largest fraction of onshore wind turbines installed globally in 2009 having a rated capacity of 1.5 to 2.5 MW; the average size of wind turbines installed in 2009 was 1.6 MW. As of 2010, wind turbines used onshore typically stand on 50- to 100-m towers, with rotors that are often 50 to 100 m in diameter; commercial machines with rotor diameters and tower heights in excess of 125 m are operating, and even larger machines are under development.

Modern wind turbines operate with rotational speeds ranging from 12 to 20 revolutions per minute (RPM), which compares to the faster and potentially more visually disruptive speeds exceeding 60 RPM common of the smaller wind turbines installed during the 1980s.

Onshore wind turbines are typically grouped together into wind power plants, sometimes also called wind farm projects or wind farms. These wind power plants are often 5 to 300 MW in size, though smaller and larger wind farm plants do exist.

The main reason for the continual increase in turbine size to this point has been to minimize the levelized generation cost of wind energy by: increasing electricity production (taller towers provide access to a higher-quality wind resource, and larger rotors allow a greater exploitation of those winds as well as more cost-effective exploitation of lower-quality wind resource sites); reducing investment costs per unit of capacity (installation of a fewer number of larger wind turbines can, to a point, reduce overall investment costs); and reducing O&M costs (larger turbines can reduce maintenance costs per unit of capacity).

For onshore wind turbines, however, additional growth in wind turbine size may ultimately be limited by not only engineering and materials usage constraints, but also by the logistical constraints (or cost of resolving those constraints) of transporting the very large blades, tower, and nacelle components by road, as well as the cost of and difficulty in obtaining large cranes to lift the components into place. These same constraints are not as binding for offshore wind turbines, so future turbine scaling to the sizes are more likely to be driven by offshore wind turbine design considerations.

As a result of these and other developments, onshore wind energy technology is already being commercially manufactured and deployed on a large scale. Moreover, modern wind turbines have nearly reached the theoretical maximum of aerodynamic efficiency, with the coefficient of performance rising from 0.44 in the 1980s to about 0.50 by the mid 2000s.

The value of 0.50 is near the practical limit dictated by the drag of aerofoils and compares with the Lanchester-Betz theoretical limit of 0.593. The design requirement for wind turbines is normally 20 years with 4,000 to 7,000 hours of operation (at and below rated power) each year depending on the characteristics of the local wind resource. Given the challenges of reliably meeting this design requirement, O&M teams work to maintain high plant availability despite component failure rates that have, in some instances, been higher than expected. Though wind turbines are reportedly under-performing in some contexts, data collected through 2008 show that modern onshore wind turbines in mature markets can achieve an availability of 97% or more.

These results demonstrate that the technology has reached sufficient commercial maturity to allow large-scale manufacturing and deployment. Nonetheless, additional advances to improve reliability, increase electricity production and reduce costs are anticipated. Additionally, most of the historical technology advances have occurred in developed countries.

Increasingly, however, developing countries are investigating the use of wind energy, and opportunities for technology transfer in wind turbine design, component manufacturing and wind power plant siting exist. Extreme environmental conditions, such as icing or typhoons, may be more prominent in some of these markets, providing impetus for continuing research. Other aspects unique to less-developed countries, such as minimal transportation infrastructure, could also influence wind turbine designs if and as these markets grow.

Offshore wind energy technology

The first offshore wind power plant was built in 1991 in Denmark, consisting of eleven 450 kW wind turbines. Offshore wind energy technology is less mature than onshore, and has higher investment and O&M costs. By the end of 2009, just 1.3% of global installed wind power capacity was installed offshore, totalling 2,100 MW.

The primary motivation to develop offshore wind energy is to provide access to additional wind resources in areas where onshore wind energy development is constrained by limited technical potential and/or by planning and siting conflicts with other land uses. Other motivations for developing offshore wind energy include: the higher-quality wind resources located at sea (e.g., higher average wind speeds and lower shear near hub height; wind shear refers to the general increase in wind speed with height); the ability to use even larger wind turbines due to avoidance of certain land-based transportation constraints and the potential to thereby gain additional economies of scale; the ability to build larger power plants than onshore, gaining plant-level economies of scale; and a potential reduction in the need for new, long-distance, land-based transmission infrastructure to access distant onshore wind energy. These factors, combined with a significant offshore wind resource potential, have created considerable interest in offshore wind energy technology in the EU and, increasingly, in other regions, despite the typically higher costs relative to onshore wind energy.

Offshore wind turbines are typically larger than onshore, with nameplate capacity ratings of 2 to 5 MW being common for offshore wind power plants built from 2007 to 2009, and even larger turbines are under development. Offshore wind farm plants installed from 2007 to 2009 were typically 20 to 120 MW in size, with a clear trend towards larger wind turbines and wind power plants over time.

Water depths for most offshore wind turbines installed through 2005 were less than 10 m, but from 2006 to 2009, water depths from 10 to more than 20 m were common. Distance to shore has most often been below 20 km, but average distance has increased over time.

As experience is gained, water depths are expected to increase further and more exposed locations with higher winds will be utilized. These trends will impact the wind resource characteristics faced by offshore wind power plants, as well as support structure design and the cost of offshore wind energy. A continued transition towards larger wind turbines (5 to 10 MW, or even larger) and wind power plants is also anticipated as a way of reducing the cost of offshore wind energy through turbine- and plant-level economies of scale.

To date, offshore wind turbine technology has been very similar to onshore designs, with some modifications and with special foundations. The mono-pile foundation is the most common, though concrete gravity-based foundations have also been used with some frequency; a variety of other foundation designs (including floating designs) are being considered and in some instances used, especially as water depths increase.

In addition to differences in foundations, modification to offshore wind turbines (relative to onshore) include structural upgrades to the tower to address wave loading; air conditioned and pressurized nacelles and other controls to prevent the effects of corrosive sea air from degrading turbine equipment; and personnel access platforms to facilitate maintenance.

Additional design changes for marine navigational safety (e.g., warning lights, fog signals) and to minimize expensive servicing (e.g., more extensive condition monitoring, onboard service cranes) are common. Wind turbine tip speed could be chosen to be greater than for onshore wind turbines because concerns about noise are reduced for offshore wind farm plants—higher tip speeds can sometimes lead to lower torque and lighter drive train components for the same power output.

In addition, tower heights are sometimes lower than used for onshore wind power plants due to reduced wind shear offshore relative to onshore. Lower power plant availabilities and higher O&M costs have been common for offshore wind energy relative to onshore wind both because of the comparatively less mature state of offshore wind energy technology and because of the inherently greater logistical challenges of maintaining and servicing offshore wind turbines.

Wind energy technology specifically tailored for offshore applications will become more prevalent as the offshore market expands, and it is expected that larger wind turbines in the 5 to 10 MW range may come to dominate this market segment.

International wind energy technology standards

Wind turbines in the 1970s and 1980s were designed using simplified design models, which in some cases led to machine failures and in other cases resulted in design conservatism. The need to address both of these issues, combined with advances in computer processing power, motivated designers to improve their calculations during the 1990s.

Improved design and testing methods have been codified in International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards, and the rules and procedures for Conformity Testing and Certification of Wind Turbines relies upon these standards. Certification agencies rely on accredited design and testing bodies to provide traceable documentation of the execution of rules and specifications outlined in the standards in order to certify turbines, components or entire wind power plants. The certification system assures that a wind turbine design or wind turbines installed in a given location meet common guidelines relating to safety, reliability, performance and testing.

Insurance companies, financing institutions and power plant owners normally require some form of certification for plants to proceed, and the IEC standards therefore provide a common basis for certification to reduce uncertainty and increase the quality of wind turbine products available in the market.

In emerging markets, the lack of highly qualified testing laboratories and certification bodies limits the opportunities for manufacturers to obtain certification according to IEC standards and may lead to lower-quality products. As markets mature and design margins are compressed to reduce costs, reliance on internationally recognized standards is likely to become even more widespread to assure consistent performance, safety and reliability of wind turbines.

Power conversion and related grid connection issues

From an electric system reliability perspective, an important part of the wind turbine is the electrical conversion system. For large grid-connected turbines, electrical conversion systems come in three broad forms. Fixed-speed induction generators were popular in earlier years for both stall-regulated and pitch-controlled turbines; in these arrangements, wind turbines were net consumers of reactive power that had to be supplied by the electric system.

For modern wind turbines, these designs have now been largely replaced with variable-speed machines. Two arrangements are common, doubly-fed induction generators and synchronous generators with a full power electronic converter, both of which are almost always coupled with pitch-controlled rotors. These variablespeed designs essentially decouple the rotating masses of the turbine from the electric system, thereby offering a number of power quality advantages over earlier turbine designs.

For example, these wind turbines can provide real and reactive power as well as some fault ride-through capability, which are increasingly being required by electric system operators. These designs differ from the synchronous generators found in most large-scale fossil fuel-powered plants, however, in that they result in no intrinsic inertial response capability, that is, they do not increase (decrease) power output in synchronism with system power imbalances. This lack of inertial response is an important consideration for electric system planners because less overall inertia in the electric system makes the maintenance of stable system operation more challenging.

Wind turbine manufacturers have recognized this lack of intrinsic inertial response as a possible long-term impediment to wind energy and are actively pursuing a variety of solutions; for example, additional turbine controls can be added to provide inertial response.
source: www.evwind.es