Monday, May 25, 2009

Louisiana Offshore Oil Port is well positioned because of dependence on foreign energy

When the nation's first offshore oil port opened off the coast of Louisiana in 1981, the country was still reeling from an energy crisis that had sapped fuel consumption and slashed commodity prices.

No market meant no profits for the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, a platform standing 18 miles south of Grand Isle in the Gulf of Mexico. The port reportedly lost more than $40 million during its first full year of operation and struggled to turn a profit for years after that.

Nearly three decades later, LOOP is a much more lucrative operation. Demand for foreign oil has doubled since the 1980s, and the port receives about as much imported crude as it can handle. LOOP is now awash in profits, with $200 million in cash reserves at the beginning of 2008, according to Moody's Investors Services. LOOP's owners -- Shell Oil Co., Marathon Oil Co. and Murphy Oil Corp. -- shared $70 million in dividends from port operations in 2007, according to Moody's.


With dependence on foreign oil expected to hold steady for at least another decade, LOOP plans to keep raking in the dough. The port is finishing up a $180 million expansion that could bring even more crude through LOOP. Six 600,000-barrel storage tanks are already up and running, and another six should be built by the end of the year.

Domestic production has created a second market. LOOP has pipelines tied into BP's Thunder Horse field and Shell's Mars field in the Gulf of Mexico. Links to other offshore fields may come down the road, said Dale Rollins, LOOP's vice president of business development.

"Our facility is designed to grow," he said.

'Changed the business'

The idea for an offshore oil port began "on the back of a napkin," according to Barb Hestermann, one of LOOP's marketing representatives.

Imported crude has always come into the United States on massive supertankers, some as long as the Empire State Building is tall. But such huge ships are too big for the nation's inland shipping channels.

Before LOOP, supertankers had to unload onto smaller ships capable of taking crude to inland ports, a process called "lightering." Searching for a way to sidestep that process, which was time-consuming and often resulted in spills, LOOP's developers hatched a plan for a port where supertankers could unload directly.

"It changed the business," said Larry Wall, a spokesman for Louisiana's Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association. "Now you can get great quantities of oil at one time."

Still, it took more than a decade of lobbying to convince state and federal regulators to back an offshore oil port. Congress ultimately cleared the way for LOOP with the Deepwater Port Act of 1974.

Others were harder to convince. Opposition came largely from environmentalists concerned about oil spills and other damage to the state's coast. LOOP's development coincided with revelations about Louisiana's endangered marshland, which has been rapidly eroding for decades under the pressures of river levees and industrial development.

LOOP ultimately tore up hundreds of acres of marsh in Lafourche Parish, making room for the complicated network of pumps and pipelines that carry oil from the offshore dock to refineries in Louisiana, Texas and the Midwest. Those facilities represent 50 percent of the nation's refining capacity.

A 1977 editorial in The Times-Picayune half-heartedly welcomed LOOP to Louisiana, calling the port a byproduct of the state's dependence on the oil industry.

"Unfortunately, oil refineries and petrochemical plants .¤.¤. seem to be the only industries we can attract, and the superport will bring us more of them," the editorial said.

Still, the economic arguments triumphed. LOOP cost $770 million to build, bringing a temporary influx of construction jobs to the state. The facility continues to employ about 160 people.

On a given day, roughly 30 workers are stationed offshore, where they work in shifts tending to the daily operations of the LOOP platform.

Others work from an office in Galliano that serves as LOOP's nerve center, which is staffed 24 hours a day. On a recent visit to the building, technicians could be seen buzzing around an arsenal of flat-screen monitors and other gadgets used to remotely control the flow of oil from the offshore platform.

A 48-inch pipeline pumps the oil to a booster station located at Port Fourchon, which then shoots the fuel into caverns carved out of a natural underwater salt dome in Clovelly, near Galliano. From the salt caverns, or from LOOP's above-ground storage tanks, the oil moves in measured batches to refineries.

About 1 million barrels of foreign crude moves each day through LOOP, or roughly 10 percent of all petroleum imported into the United States.

Additional effects

Louisiana gets jobs and some tax dollars directly from LOOP, but there have been many other indirect consequences, Rollins said.

While about half of the nation's refineries have closed since the 1980s, Louisiana has lost only two small facilities since then, leaving the state with 17 active refineries. Most have direct lines to LOOP, although it is difficult to tie the prosperity of the state's refining sector directly to the port, Wall said.

Still, the company that is spearheading one of the biggest refinery expansions ever undertaken credits LOOP for at least part of the decision to launch the $3.4 billion project in Garyville.

Marathon spokesman Robert Calmus said LOOP will provide easy access to oil for the Garyville refinery, which by year's end should be converted from the nation's 18th-biggest refinery to the country's fourth-largest.

"Because Garyville is so close to the Gulf of Mexico, that refinery probably gets more crude from LOOP than our other refineries," Calmus said, estimating that 75 percent of the plant's crude comes through LOOP.

Although Marathon is an owner, the company is not supposed to get special consideration for shipments through LOOP. The port must operate as a common-carrier system, and is regulated by both the state and federal governments, according to Calmus.

"We have to bid for space just like everybody else," he said.

Some concerns

The average consumer might also have ties to LOOP. Many observers think the facility has put some downward pressure on retail fuel prices nationwide, possibly lowering prices at the pump.

"What LOOP has done is minimize the cost of transporting imported crude to selected U.S. refineries," Eric Smith, a Tulane University business professor, wrote in an e-mail. "The LOOP pipeline has also made possible the shipment of some offshore production to shore without the need to build another Gulf of Mexico pipeline."

Gulf production may well be LOOP's next big market. Although domestic oil consumption is not expected to decline by 2030, foreign imports should fall somewhat as production in the Gulf unearths more domestic oil, according to the federal Energy Information Administration.

With that in mind, a team of investors recently proposed building a facility similar to LOOP off the coast of Texas, called the Texas Offshore Port System. The proposal has been put on hold, however, after members of the team pulled out.

Although LOOP eventually might want to expand further into Texas, Rollins expressed ambivalence about the prospect of competition.

"We don't see TOPS as a threat," he said.

LOOP's biggest concern is the national economy. LOOP saw shipments slide by roughly 10 percent this year, after demand for oil retracted under the weight of the recession. But Rollins expects shipments to rebound, and even grow, by early next year.

President Barack Obama, who is trying to shift the nation away from fossil fuels in favor of renewable energy, is another concern. Proposed caps on carbon emissions will have a drastic effect on refineries, which produce large amounts of that greenhouse gas, a known contributor to global warming.

But LOOP officials are not sounding any alarm bells.

"We don't see any immediate threats," Rollins said. "The U.S. is going to rely upon petroleum for some time to come."

Jen DeGregorio can be reached at 504.826.3495 or jdegregorio@timespicayune.com.

source: www.nola.com

Medical Guidelines for Offshore Workers

In 1998, the ILO and WHO adopted the Guidelines for Conducting Pre-sea and Periodic Medical Fitness Examinations for Seafarers. These guidelines outline specific examples of the unique nature of the shipboard environment and dictate that a medical examiner must consider the following when issuing a "fit-for-duty" medical certificate:

* Seafarers should be medically fit to perform their normal duties correctly and to be able to respond to emergency situations (e.g., fighting fires, lowering lifeboats, assisting passengers, etc.)

* Seafarers should be able to adjust to the often violent motions of the ship, to be able to live and work in sometimes cramped spaces, to be able to climb ladders and to lift heavy weights and to be able to withstand exposure to harsh weather conditions on deck or excessive heat in the machinery spaces."

These guidelines as well as the U.K. Merchant Shipping Notice 1712 (M), for example, also outline minimum vision and hearing requirements for crew members and list certain medical conditions which might render a potential seafarer temporarily or permanently "unfit-for-duty." These include, but are not limited to, "any disability impairing muscle power, balance, mobility and coordination." Certain contagious and infectious diseases are also covered.


Offshore oil, seismic, and support workers are non-seafarers. They differ from seafarers in that they are not assigned emergency duties, are not responsible for assisting others in an emergency, and are not required to receive any specific emergency training such as firefighting. During an emergency, these non-seafarers are assigned to a muster station located in specific sections on board the vessel.

Non-seafarers are required to be given information regarding how to recognize the emergency alarm, what actions to take in the event of an emergency alarm, how to don their life jackets, how to get to their muster station, and other general safety information. They are also required to participate in an emergency drill where this information is repeated and explained. Non-seafarers are not required to receive any further safety or emergency training.

Non-seafarers are not covered by these international agreements. As a result, groups in several countries such as Canada, Australia, and the UK have published their own medical screening guidelines for offshore workers. The utility of these guidelines for US employers, however, is questionable. U.S. employers must ensure that their medical screening guidelines are developed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act as well as other civil rights legislation and the decisions of US Courts.

To facilitate this responsibility, MED-TOX has devised a model for conducting the preplacement medical examination that requires an individualized assessment of the entering candidate's physical capabilities in relation to the specific physical tasks and environmental hazards of the offshore environment. In making this assessment, function is more important than diagnosis and individual case-by-case determination is more important than broad exclusions based on diagnosis. Risk to coworkers, the company, and the candidate (job applicant) is an important feature of this determination. Some of the factors considered in developing the guidelines for offshore workers include:

* Offshore employees work far offshore or in inaccessible areas. As a result, it is very difficult to replace workers who become injured or ill. The typical vessel will have only the minimal number of persons on board necessary to perform the offshore tasks. Thus the incapacitation of even one employee may place a substantial additional burden on his or her coworkers.

* While many offshore vessels are equipped with basic medical supplies and nursing personnel. Nevertheless, it is quite expensive and quite difficult to transport sick or injured workers ashore where they can be treated by physicians. It is therefore inadvisable and often unsafe to allow persons with certain medical conditions to work offshore.

* All persons assigned to offshore duties should be medically fit to perform their normal duties correctly. The individual should be able to adjust to the often violent motions of the vessel, to be able to live and work in sometimes cramped spaces, to be able to climb ladders and to lift heavy weights and to be able to withstand exposure to harsh weather conditions including excessive heat and humidity. As they often travel by jet and helicopter to reach and return from their assigned vessel, offshore workers should not suffer from conditions which are exacerbated by air travel.

* Offshore workers must be able to live and work closely with the same people for weeks at a time and under occasionally stressful conditions. They should be capable of dealing effectively with isolation from family and friends and interacting with persons from diverse cultural backgrounds.

These factors, and many other factors, guided the physician experts who developed the MED-TOX Offshore Worker Medical Screening Manual. The Manual is the most comprehensive occupational medical screening manual ever developed for assessing job applicants for offshore work.

For each medical condition, the Medical Screening Manual for Offshore Workers describes the job-related factors (physical abilities and working conditions) that should be evaluated by the examining physician prior to making a placement recommendation. Expert occupational medical advice and guidance for the evaluation of a wide variety of conditions likely to be present in the applicant population. Detailed coverage is given to recurring issues in medical screening such as appropriate vision and hearing requirements, assessment of persons with diabetes, musculoskeletal injuries, HIV+ status, seizure disorders, and a multitude of other complex issues.

The Medical Screening Manual for Offshore Workers covers the following:

Chapter I: MEDICAL SCREENING UNDER THE ADA

* The Preplacement Examination
* The Americans with Disabilities Act (updated to 2002
* Evaluating Risk
* Reasonable Accommodation
* Job Analysis Information
* Summary
* References

Chapter II: PREPLACEMENT EXAMINATION PROTOCOL

* Recommended Procedures and Tests

Chapter III: MEDICAL GUIDELINES

* Dermatological System
* Ears, Nose and Throat
* Eyes and Vision
* Ears and Hearing
* Pulmonary System
* Cardiovascular System
* Endocrine System
* Gastrointestinal System
* Genitourinary System
* Hematopoietic System
* Musculoskeletal System
* Neurologic System
* Oncology
* Infectious Disease

Chapter IV: APPENDICES

* Medical History Questionnaire
* Clinical Examination Form


The Medical Screening Manual for Offshore Workers has been designed to assist examiners in closely focusing on the actual physical demands and working conditions of the job. This linkage allows for an individualized assessment of the individual in relation to the job as required by law.

Contact MED-TOX to determine how this manual can be customized for your organization to assist you with evaluating potential and injured workers in the offshore industry.

source: www.med-tox.com

Offshore Medicals

Every offshore worker must undergo and pass a medical examination which classifies them as medically fit to work in the offshore environment.

Different offshore authorities have different requirements. For UK waters only physicians who are approved by the United Kingdom Offshore Operators Association (UKOOA) Health Advisory Committee should carry out the examination and issue certificates.

The offshore medical certificate, as it is commonly known, is only valid for a limited time, and you need to renew it to continue working offshore. The frequency for renewal depends on the authority controlling the asset you are visiting and your age.


For UK waters, all assets are controlled by UKOOA and renewals are necessary 2-yearly, with effect from 1 Jan 2007, irrespective of the age of the offshore person.

Individual Operators retain the right to request medical assessments more frequently.

The UK Medical
Although UKOOA set out the minimum to be included in the medical, contractors report that some doctors carry out a more in-depth examination than others. A typical examination will begin with you filling out an extensive form on your medical history, and lifestyle e.g. alcohol consumption, exercise etc. After this a physical examination will be carried out:
- Urine check (for protein and sugar)
- Height, weight and resultant Body Mass Index calculation
- Blood pressure and pulse
- Basic eye sight test including colour vision
- Lung capacity check
- Hearing test
- A physical examination by a doctor. Check stature, listen to your breathing, reflexes etc.
- The doctor will also discuss the form you filled in, and carry out any additional checks they think necessary.

If your employer is paying for the examination they may ask for additional checks, e.g. drug test, to be carried out.
See our Services Directory page for medical providers.
Offshore Abroad
Different countries have different requirements: some stricter than the UK and others less so. Be aware that a UKOOA medical certificate may not be adequate for where you intend to work. The Offshore Operators Association from three countries involved in the North Sea: the UK (UKOOA); Norway (OLF); and The Netherlands (NOGEPA) have signed a reciprocal agreement known as the Hardanger Agreement which states that a valid medical certificate in one country will be valid in the two other countries within the agreement.

Although this agreement is in place, many contractors report that a UKOOA medical certificate is not being accepted at Norwegian heliport check-ins. Therefore, many,contractors pay an extra £10 or so to have an OLF certificate issued by their doctor at the same time as their UKOOA certificate. Not all UKOOA approved doctors issue OLF medical certificates. If you need this certificate, check when booking your appointment.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

World's largest wind farm finally gets go-ahead

The world's largest offshore wind farm is to be built 12 miles off the Kent coast in time for the London Olympics in 2012.

By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent
Last Updated: 8:37PM BST 12 May 2009


With 341 turbines spread over 90 square miles, the one gigawatt offshore wind farm will provide enough energy to power 750,000 homes – a quarter of all those in Greater London.


Earlier in the year it was feared the ambitious project was dead in the water after energy giants Royal Dutch Shell pulled out and soaring construction costs put the development on a "knife edge".

However an international coalition of Germany's E.ON, Denmark's Dong Energy and the Gulf investment fund Masdar have decided to invest £2 billion together to go-ahead with the scheme after the Chancellor announced increased subsidies for offshore wind in this year's Budget.


The first phase of 175 turbines, that will power up to 500,000 homes, could be up and running by 2012. Onshore work is due to start in the summer, with offshore work due to begin in early 2011.

Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, welcomed the development.

He said: "The London Array is a flagship project in our drive to cut emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 and meet future energy needs. The UK is a world leader in offshore wind farms, creating jobs and prosperity for the economy.

"That's why we have increased our support for this technology as we move towards a low carbon future."

Environmental groups Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth also welcomed the project, which is expected to generate hundreds of jobs.

However Martin Harper of the RSPB was more cautious, warning that any development of the site beyond the first phase must take into account the environmental impact on bird life in the Thames Estuary.
source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Dolphin Offshore soars 20% on bonus issue

Dolphin Offshore Enterprises has surged 20% to its upper limit on the back of an bonus issue.

The stock opened at Rs 157, down Rs 4. It surged 20% to it's upper circuit of Rs 193. The stock is currently locked at the circuit with buy orders of 5,756 still pending on the BSE. The counter has witnessed comparatively heavy trading volumes of 69,328 as against the two-week daily traded average of 1,453 shares.

The company has informed the BSE today that the board is considering the issue of 2 bonus shares on every 5 equity shares. Further, the board has also recommended 30% dividend.

According to a release issued by the company the net profit has increased 19% to Rs 20.99 crore in the quarter ended March 2009 from Rs 17.61 crore in the corresponding quarter a year ago. The total income is Rs 119.16 crore in Q4FY09 while it was Rs 117.64 crore in Q4FY08.

Guide to a Perfect Offshore Outsourcing Vendor Deal

Pam Baker 13.05.2009

Cost-cutting: Beleaguered companies see it as the only sure action in an uncertain world. They think that if they cut costs beyond the bone, surely profits will seep from the wound.

Cost-cutting: Beleaguered companies see it as the only sure action in an uncertain world. They think that if they cut costs beyond the bone, surely profits will seep from the wound.

During times of economic turmoil, when the pressure to cut costs is most intense, many companies turn to offshore outsourcing. They see it is a quick way to reduce IT and other back-office expenses.

Under financial strain, however, companies-even those that are experienced with offshore outsourcing-make knee-jerk decisions, and in their haste, they fail to consider provisions in outsourcing contracts that would protect their staff, give them more control over the staff the outsourcing company allocates to their projects, or safeguard their intellectual property. The outsourcing deals they ink end up doing much more harm to their bottom lines than good.



Richard Green, partner at law firm Robinson & Cole LLP, spent a good part of the previous recession as an in-house lawyer with a business process outsourcing (BPO) provider, where he witnessed first-hand the bad contract negotiation decisions clients made under cost and time pressure.

He says customers made concessions on operating level agreements (OLAs) and service level agreements (SLAs) after only a round or two of negotiations.

"If an issue [with an SLA or OLA] wasn't going to save the customer money in the short term or speed up deal closing, we on the supplier side needed only to dig in [our heels] for a bit to get our way," says Green.

Green cites the offshore outsourcing engagement Lehman Brothers entered into in 2002 with Spectramind (now owned by Wipro) to have the Indian company manage its internal help desk as an example of a deal that a customer didn't give due consideration.

"The function Lehman outsourced was universally viewed as too complex and immature within Lehman's own organization to be a good candidate for outsourcing," says Green. "Yet, driven by dollar signs, Lehman did it anyway with disastrous results. The performance and the feedback from internal company customers was so terrible they shut it down a few months later." Lehman had to bring help desk management back in house.

Conseco had a similar experience when it outsourced a contact center to India in 2001, says Green. Customers were so up in arms over the move that Conseco brought the contact center back to the U.S. in 2003, he says.

Lehman's and Conseco's experiences make it clear that the biggest offshoring mistake companies can make in this environment is moving too quickly. Besides proceeding too fast, companies should make sure they avoid the following eight pitfalls that thwart companies' best efforts to save money through offshore outsourcing.

1. Don't let offshore outsourcing vendors pad contracts with initial set-up fees.

Vendors realize that most outsourcing deals are price-driven. Therefore, some take dubious measures to ensure that they are the lowest bidder. Their low bids are often an illusion because they add costs elsewhere to make the deal more profitable for themselves in the end.

"This practice has been perfected to an art by some offshore vendors," says Anupam Govil, chairman of the Global Sourcing Forum + Expo, a trade show focused exclusively on outsourcing. Consequently, he adds, customers are often struck with a "nasty surprise" when unreasonably high set-up fees suddenly appear in the final contract.

To avoid such surprises, Govil recommends that customers ask prospective offshoring partners for fully loaded cost estimates. This way, when prospective buyers match quotes from different outsourcing companies, they can make apples to apples comparisons, he says.

2. Don't give more work to your outsourcing provider just because of a pre-existing contract.

Robinson & Cole's Green sees many companies pile work on an existing offshore outsourcing partner for convenience's sake.

"The thinking has been, 'Well, we already successfully outsource function X to supplier A, why not just throw another statement of work on supplier A's master agreement and outsource functions Y and Z too,' " he says.

That's a mistake because your existing outsourcing partner may not be the best vendor for those new functions, says Green. Your vendor might not offer the best price for those functions, or they might not have the expertise or experience managing those functions. What's more, the new functions you're thinking of outsourcing might not even lend themselves to offshore outsourcing.

Before you fork over new work to your outsourcing provider, consider if the work is best suited to your vendor.

3. Don't lose control of change management.

Diana J.P. McKenzie, partner and chair of information technology law at Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP, sees too many companies treat outsourcing deals as static.

"All of these deals will change over the time," she says. "This is the nature of IT."

McKenzie advises offshore outsourcing customers to make sure their contracts include a process for handling changes to the contract as business conditions necessitate. (See also How to Renegotiate an Outsourcing Contract.

4. Don't depend on a foreign judicial system for relief.

When disputes between a customer and offshore outsourcing partner arise (as they often do when deals are rushed), customers can't depend on a foreign judicial system, particularly in India, to help settle the dispute.

"In India, it can take longer to get something through the court system than it does to raise a child," says McKenzie. "A contract must have an arbitration provision to have any hope of getting a timely resolution. Better yet, insist contract disputes be resolved in the USA."

5. Don't fail to validate the credentials of the outsourcing staff.

Unfortunately, it's not uncommon for staff at offshore outsourcing firms to fake their professional and educational credentials-and for their employers to let them get away with it.

"In India, one can easily obtain credentials through a variety of means, such as fake mailing addresses and fake phone numbers," says Mike Drips, a Microsoft SharePoint consultant who has worked on multi-million dollar projects for a variety of Fortune 500 companies including American Express, Verizon, Microsoft and GE.

If your offshore provider's staff isn't above board, you can't expect to get quality service, so make sure to perform background checks on staff.

6. Don't let your staff burn out.

In the heat of contract negotiations, it can be easy to forget certain provisions that will keep your staff sane, such as having your offshore vendor tailor its work hours to yours so that your staff doesn't have to work through multiple time zones.

"You are paying them money, so you should not be getting up at 3 AM for a conference call," says Drips. "The vendor's staff should be getting up [early or staying up late] to talk to you."

Another way to lower your and your staff's frustration is by adding a clause that demands English speakers, recommends Drips. English-speaking contacts may not automatically be provided to you if you have not added this provision to the contract, even if the overall outsourced function requires English-speaking roles.

7. Don't accept your domestic project manager's recommendations without evaluating the details of the deal yourself.

Offshore outsourcing providers will sometimes try to influence deals by wooing project managers with exotic trips and gifts, says Drips.

"Be wary if your domestic project manager suddenly has the funds to go on a three week visit to the country that your offshore vendor is located in," warns Drips.

Because enticement is not uncommon, scrutinizing deals yourself is critical. Also essential: Double checking all staff recommendations to ensure their opinions haven't been unduly swayed. If you don't vet your staff's recommendations or review outsourcing deals on your own, you risk entering into a disadvantageous contract.

8. Don't get caught in a data security trap.

Many outsourcing deals stipulate that the client is responsible for data security and require the client to secure its data before delivering it to an outsourcing partner.

"This makes sense until you realize that the entire goal of the outsourcing arrangement is to move as much work as possible to lower cost resources," says Mike Logan, president of Axis Technology, an IT consulting firm.

He adds that outsourcing customers can find themselves in a Catch-22 situation where they can't realize the cost savings from offshoring because they have to invest extra money in data security. And unfortunately, he says, there's no easy solution to the conundrum.

Exercise Discipline

The best safeguard against all these pitfalls is to take your time. "Companies that are successful at outsourcing will often dedicate years before a contract is even signed," says Robinson & Cole's Green. "They do financial modeling, risk identification and mitigation planning, technical, financial and reputational due diligence on potential suppliers, and head-to-head contract negotiation to force suppliers to cough up the best terms."
source: news.idg.no

Friday, May 8, 2009

It's Official: No IRS Penalty for Mere Failure to File "Foreign Bank Account Reporting" Form

In the last few months, the IRS has dramatically increased the pressure on U.S. taxpayers with unreported foreign accounts. Its lawsuit against Swiss banking giant UBS demanding that the bank identify more than 52,000 U.S. persons alleged to have accounts there has received the greatest attention.

The IRS has also ramped up other enforcement tools to identify taxpayers using offshore accounts and entities to avoid tax. The most important of these are a series of “John Doe” summonses seeking credit card records of U.S. merchants alleged to be hiding money in offshore bank accounts.

But on April 20, 2009, the IRS announced an initiative that offers taxpayers who make a full disclosure regarding unreported funds offshore a reduction in possible penalties. The offer is effective for six months and ends Oct. 20.

Some commentators—including Bob Bauman, legal counsel to The Sovereign Society—have justifiably criticized the initiative. The problem is that the IRS is under no obligation to grant the reduced penalties to a taxpayer who comes forward. It can still pursue criminal charges and penalties if it wishes.


However, yesterday, the IRS posted a series of questions and answers on its Web site that answered a crucial question for taxpayers who reported all the income from their offshore accounts, but never filed Form TD F 90-22.1, the "foreign bank account reporting" form.

If you're in this situation, the IRS now says you can file the delinquent forms, and the IRS will not impose a penalty. To learn more, follow this link: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-news/faqs.pdf and see the answer to question 9.

On the other hand, if you have unreported offshore income, don't contact the IRS yourself. Contact a lawyer who specializes in criminal tax defense first. Your lawyer, not you, should approach the IRS.
source: nestmannblog.sovereignsociety.com

Global Offshore signs $35M deal with India biz

CARLYSS, La. – Global Offshore International Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Global Industries Ltd., was awarded a two-year contract with The Shipping Corp. of India Ltd., for diving services, personnel, and equipment maintenance to be performed off the shore of India aboard three Oil and Natural Gas Corp. vessels.

The contract, which is valued at approximately $35 million, has an option to be extended for up to six additional months, said the company.

Global Offshore International is a service provider of offshore construction, engineering, project management and support services including pipeline construction, platform installation and removal, deepwater/SURF installations, inspection, repair and maintenance and diving to the oil and gas industry worldwide. Global Offshore has annual revenue of more than $124 million and more than 1,600 employees. The water, sewer and utility construction company was founded in 1995 and is based in Carlyss.

MacGREGOR develops fiber rope deepwater lifting system

Offshore staff

HELSINKI -- MacGREGOR has developed an ultra deepwater lifting system using fiber rope technology.

The new ultra deepwater lifting system uses a side-mounted frame fixed onto a vessel. This allows the crane to lower a load to a depth of 1,000 m (3,281 ft), after which the load is transferred to a straight fiber rope; the crane hook is returned to the surface, reattached to the upper end of the fiber rope, and then a new length of up to 1,000 m (3,281 ft) is deployed. This hook-moving sequence can be repeated until the desired depth is reached. As landing heave compensation is enabled through a winch operation using traditional steel cable, spooling, and bending the critical fiber rope is avoided.

The new lifting solution is available as 150-metric-ton (165-ton) capacity or 250-metric-ton (276-ton) capacity systems and can be supplied ready for various lengths of fiber rope.

"As the system does not weaken the fiber rope or present any challenges related to spooling the full load, MacGREGOR is confident that it can now offer a safe and reliable solution for ultra deepwater load handling," says Svein Erik Halvorsen, R&D director for MacGREGOR's Offshore division.

Ex-Im-Bank commits $2.2 billion to support US exports to Petrobras

Offshore staff

WASHINGTON, DC -- Small and large US companies may benefit from a nonbinding preliminary commitment of $2 billion in financing from the Export-Import Bank of the US (Ex-Im Bank) to encourage purchases of US goods and services by Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras). Pending final approval, the financing is anticipated to support more than $2.2 billion of US exports to Petrobras.

Ex-Im Bank anticipates that this preliminary commitment will give Petrobras the opportunity to identify potential US exporters for its projects over the next two years. Upon conversion of the preliminary commitment to a final commitment, the financing could be used to support US exports on repayment terms of up to 10 years, including a potential conversion of part of the financing to establish a medium-term (one to seven years) credit guarantee facility.

Petrobras may use US goods and services financed under an Ex-Im Bank final commitment to develop its offshore oil and gas reserves, particularly the large pre-salt reserves in the Santos basin, and also to develop and upgrade its refining and distribution infrastructure. Petrobras anticipates that it will invest $174 billion in development over the next five years.

US companies of all sizes that are interested in exploring export opportunities to Petrobras may contact Philip Limón, treasurer, Petrobras America Inc. in Houston, Texas, (713-808-2160; plimon@petrobras-usa.com) to learn more about the company's bidding process and how to participate in transactions that could be financially assisted by Ex-Im Bank.

source: www.offshore-mag.com

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Why Jobs Go Begging Amid Layoffs

Are American employers too picky? Are they rejecting reasonable candidates at the same time they claim to have lots of openings they would like to fill?

That's a key question because the job market is still getting worse even as the overall economy shows signs of reaching bottom. On May 6 the ADP National Employment Report said the private sector shrank payrolls by an estimated 491,000 jobs in April. Economists—who don't always trust the ADP numbers—expect the Bureau of Labor Statistics to report on May 8 a decline of about 600,000 jobs in the private and public sectors combined. The median unemployment-rate forecast in the latest Bloomberg survey of economists is 8.9% for April, vs. 8.5% in March.

With the labor market so weak, it's hard to understand why so many jobs are unfilled. As BusinessWeek pointed out in a recent magazine cover story, employers reported that they had 3 million openings they were actively trying to fill as of the end of February. (The March job-openings total will be released May 12.) By contrast, there were more than 13 million people unemployed in March.
Outdated Skills

So what gives? Why don't employers give jobs to some of those 13 million people who are eager to work? Wouldn't that make everybody happy?

Employers don't see it that way. They say that jobless people don't necessarily have the skills they're looking for—especially since the sectors with the most openings (education and health care) are very different from the ones that are losing the most workers, manufacturing and construction. Even within the same industry, employers say, there are people whose skills are outdated or out of sync with what's needed for the jobs that need filling.

But BusinessWeek was deluged with comments from people, many of them unemployed, who said employers are too picky, want to avoid paying for training, want to export jobs, or would rather hire cheap foreigners on H-1B visas. Here's a typical comment from someone who signed herself Lucy: "I don't believe this article at all; it's hogwash. IBM is not laying off people because of a skills-mismatch problem. They are laying off people because they want to offshore all U.S. jobs to low-wage countries, or bring in more people to the U.S. under the H-1B visa program. They also don't want to train U.S. employees."

Workers offered similar perspectives to BusinessWeek while the story was being reported. Donald Smith, who lives in Alamo, Calif., says he has decades of experience in the semiconductor-manufacturing business but has not been able to land a job in the field since 2003. The fact that he's not currently working in the field counts against him, he says. Employers' attitude is: "You're obviously not the most qualified person because if you were, somebody would want you," Smith says.
Leery of Bad Hires

Even some headhunters said they think employers are super-picky at this stage in the recession. Managers put their own jobs at risk if they make a bad hire at a time like this, says Jay Kizer, who heads life-sciences recruiting for Korn/Ferry (KFY), a big executive recruiter. Says Kizer: "The search is open, they'd like to fill it, but they're being extremely cautious about pulling the trigger."

Of course, employers have a comeback. IBM (IBM), for example, says it has a $1 billion-a-year training budget and aims to fill many newly created jobs by shifting workers who are no longer needed in other parts of its business. In many cases, employers say, workers really don't have the ability to do the jobs that need to be done.

C. Michael King, business development manager for Workplace Staffing in hard-hit Rockford, Ill., told BusinessWeek that "we have people coming in with really no tangible skills to offer." Also, says King, some people have skills that have been rendered obsolete—for example, many tool-and-die makers. King says he knows of one skilled manual machinist who had to move into sales because he couldn't master computer numerically controlled machines.

Says King: "He's someone who doesn't have a computer at home and really doesn't know how to use a computer."

Are employers too picky, or do the unemployed have unrealistic expectations? The answer is a little bit of both.

source: www.businessweek.com

Job loss a threat on the wane

MANILA, Philippines—The National Economic and Development Authority has expressed confidence that the country’s employment woes, marked by job layoffs mostly in the manufacturing sector, may soon be over.

According to Dennis Arroyo, Neda director for policy and planning, there have been indications that job cuts by firms here in the country may have already reached its peak in March.

“There are signs that job displacements are already bottoming out,” Arroyo told reporters. “Official data are encouraging.” He cited data from the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), showing that layoffs reached 1,026 in the first half of April. This was a stark slowdown from the peak of 14,512 job losses recorded in March.


Job cuts have been blamed on the recession in advanced economies, particularly in the United States, that serve as major export markets of the Philippines.

Hardest hit are electronics exporters, which saw a drastic slide in global demand for their products. Analysts said that, in tough times, it was natural for households to focus spending only on essentials.

Because electronics is the country’s major export product, accounting for about 60 percent of total, anemic global demand for these items dragged down the country’s export revenue. Exports have been falling by double-digit figures since late last year.

But Arroyo said job cuts in the electronics sector would soon end. He cited a report by the US-based Semiconductors Industry Association that sales of semiconductors inched up a bit to $14.7 billion in March from $14.2 billion in February.

As far as overseas employment is concerned, Arroyo said, prospects were also improving. He said projections of declines in remittances—due to layoffs in advanced economies—were exaggerated given that job opportunities were opening in other offshore labor markets.

source: www.inquirer.net

Westpac H1 profit slips 1.2pc as bad debts triple

WESTPAC'S first-half net profit slipped 1.2 per cent, and it slashed its interim dividend, as a sharp rise in bad loans offset higher revenues generated from its acquisition of St George Bank.

Westpac, Australia’s largest bank by market capitalisation, said in a statement that net profit for the six months ended March 31 fell to $2.18 billion from $2.20 billion a year earlier.

The reported figure includes results for St George from November 18, 2008.

Cash earnings, the preferred measure of profitability because it excludes one-off items, fell 6 per cent to $2.295 billion.

Analysts had forcast cash earnings of $2.28 billion.

The lender also slashed its interim dividend to 56c a share from 70c a year ago, in line with moves by rivals.

COMPANY PROFILE and CHART

Although Australia’s major banks have managed to avoid the worst of the global credit crunch, they have sought to boost their capital positions to cushion against rising bad loans.

Revenue rose to $8.09 billion from $5.9 billion a year ago, and the group’s net interest margin improved to 2.24 per cent, up 24 basis points on year.

But like its peers Westpac reported a sharp jump in charges for bad loans as the global credit crunch filters through to the real economy, with Australia headed for its first technical recession in almost 20 years.

Impairment charges for bad and doubtful debts rose to $1.56 billion from $433 million a year earlier, in part due to St George’s loan book, but mostly reflecting the group’s exposure to failed corporates ABC Learning, Allco and troubled loans to Babcock & Brown International.

The group also cited a step up in losses in its margin lending book.

Chief executive Gail Kelly said that impairment charges were likely to continue to rise in the coming 18 months.

“While the larger impairments associated with the impacts of the global financial crisis appear largely behind us, we are seeing more pressure across our business customers and expect consumer stress to grow as unemployment rises,” Ms Kelly said.

“As a result we expect impairment charges to remain at a high level throughout the second half of 2009 and into 2010.”

The bank noted that credit quality has deteriorated in Australia, but the severity is likely to be less than in other developed economies such as the US and the UK thanks to a number of factors, including the nation’s “healthy banking sector” and the relative strength of the nation’s economy going into the downturn.

Bad debt impairments on a proforma basis were $1.611 billion, and the group said total provisioning now stands at $4.5 billion. Proforma results assume the merger was completed on October 1, 2007.

Ms Kelly, a former St George Bank chief, said Westpac was making good progress with its integration of St George.

St George reported proforma cash earnings of $529 million for the half, up 6 per cent on year, and impairments increased by $115 million on year.

The group’s Westpac retail and business banking arm recorded a 17 per cent improvement in cash earnings, supported by strong growth in lending and deposits.

But its institutional bank saw a 62 per cent drop in proforma cash earnings to $158 million, as sour loans offset strong revenue growth in its markets and transactional services offerings.

Its BT Financial funds management arm recorded a 17 per cent drop in cash earnings on a proforma basis, impacted by lower fees from funds under management due to weak investment markets.

Westpac’s New Zealand arm recorded a 15 per cent decline in cash profit to $NZ202 million ($158 million), primarily due to higher impairment costs resulting from the “deepening and prolonged recession” in that country.

Ms Kelly said the group’s markets division revenue growth was likely to remain positive, the strong result seen during the first half was unlikely to be repeated, but the bank expected system credit growth to continue to slow.

On a proforma basis, total loan growth for the first half was 9 per cent, and deposits grew 8 per cent on year, with consumer deposits up 27 per cent, ahead of sector growth and helping the group’s overall funding position.

The bank said it was well progressed in its fiscal 2009 term funding task, and expected second-half term issuance to be significantly lower than that seen in the first half. It also reported strong reverse interest for its bonds.

Westpac's Tier 1 capital position at the end of the period was 8.37 per cent, which chief financial officer Phil Coffey described as “ample”.

source: www.theaustralian.news.com.au

Oil rises to five-month high on economic optimism

Graphics shows the price of light, sweet crude oil in the past 12 months. Light, sweet crude for June delivery rose 1.27 U.S. dollars to settle at 54.47 dollars a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange on May 5, 2009, which is the highest closing price since Nov. 24, 2008.(Xinhua/Zhang Liyun)

Graphics shows the price of light, sweet crude oil in the past 12 months. Light, sweet crude for June delivery rose 1.27 U.S. dollars to settle at 54.47 dollars a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange on May 5, 2009, which is the highest closing price since Nov. 24, 2008.(Xinhua/Zhang Liyun)
Photo Gallery>>>

NEW YORK, May 4 (Xinhua) -- Crude oil rose for a fourth straight session and reached a five-month high on Monday, as upbeat economic data boosted energy investors' hope in demand recovery.

Light, sweet crude for June delivery rose 1.27 U.S. dollars to settle at 54.47 dollars a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, which is the highest closing price since Nov. 24, 2008.


Oil obtained support from positive reports from pending home sales and construction spending. The National Association of Realtors said its pending home sales index rose 3.2 percent to 84.6 in March, far surpassing economists' expectation of 82.1.

The U.S. Commerce Department reported that construction spending rose 0.3 percent in March after dropping for five straight months. Economists had expected the reading to drop 1.5 percent.

In London, Brent crude for June delivery rose 1.70 dollars to 54.55 dollars a barrel on the ICE Futures Exchange.
source: